The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Cohort Study on the Relationship between Microscopic Work and Decreased Visual Acuity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1539/sangyoeisei.45.248 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasuhiro Komiya, Hiroyuki Nakao, Yoshiki Kuroda, Hirohisa Imai, Takahiko Katoh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2021.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health
#184
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,220
of 139,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.