↓ Skip to main content

調査研究ノート SNS時代の誤情報・虚偽情報とマスメディアの打ち消し報道

Overview of attention for article published in The NHK Monthly Report on Broadcast Research, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 116)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
調査研究ノート SNS時代の誤情報・虚偽情報とマスメディアの打ち消し報道
Published in
The NHK Monthly Report on Broadcast Research, September 2019
DOI 10.24634/bunken.69.8_100
Authors

福長 秀彦

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,656,893
of 26,586,231 outputs
Outputs from The NHK Monthly Report on Broadcast Research
#17
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,582
of 357,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The NHK Monthly Report on Broadcast Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,586,231 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them