↓ Skip to main content

PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC DILATATION OF THE BENIGN BILIARY STRICTURE.-A CASE REPORT-

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC DILATATION OF THE BENIGN BILIARY STRICTURE.-A CASE REPORT-
Published in
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 1983
DOI 10.3919/ringe1963.44.1087
Authors

Tetsuro MIYATA, Takao MATSUMINE, Takao ISHIDA, Atsushi FUKUTOME, Motohide SODEYAMA, Hiroto KOYAMA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#142
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,650
of 33,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.