The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a multi-dimensional scale for PDD and ADHD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.052 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasuko Funabiki, Hisaya Kawagishi, Teruhisa Uwatoko, Sayaka Yoshimura, Toshiya Murai |
| Abstract |
A novel assessment scale, the multi-dimensional scale for pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (MSPA), is reported. Existing assessment scales are intended to establish each diagnosis. However, the diagnosis by itself does not always capture individual characteristics or indicate the level of support required, since inter-individual differences are substantial and co-morbidity is common. The MSPA consists of 14 domains and each domain is rated by a nine-point quantitative scale. The clinical and behavioral features are projected onto a radar-chart, which facilitates understanding of the disorders both by the patients themselves and by those in their surroundings. We assessed 179 patients and analyzed features by six diagnostic subgroups, which showed relationships between features and diagnoses. The inter-rater reliability was satisfactory. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 35% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 27 | 30% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,874,392
of 26,547,438 outputs
Outputs from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities
#228
of 2,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,094
of 120,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,547,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.