You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
教室にフィールドが立ち上がる アフリカ狩猟採集社会を題材とする演劇手法を用いたワークショップ
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Cultural Anthropology, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.14890/jjcanth.85.2_325 |
| Authors |
飯塚 宜子, 園田 浩司, 田中 文菜, 大石 高典 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2021.
All research outputs
#17,863,266
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Cultural Anthropology
#59
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,513
of 544,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Cultural Anthropology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 544,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them