The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Triexponential Diffusion Analysis of Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Magnetic resonance in medical sciences MRMS an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0103 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masako Ohno, Naoki Ohno, Tosiaki Miyati, Hiroko Kawashima, Kazuto Kozaka, Yukihiro Matsuura, Toshifumi Gabata, Satoshi Kobayashi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,505,621
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic resonance in medical sciences MRMS an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#117
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,082
of 548,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic resonance in medical sciences MRMS an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 548,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.