You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quality benchmarking of smartphone laboratory medicine applications: comparison of laboratory medicine specialists’ and non-laboratory medicine professionals’ evaluation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1515/cclm-2020-0869 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Snežana Jovičić, Joanna Siodmiak, Marta Duque Alcorta, Maximillian Kittel, Wytze Oosterhuis, Kristin Moberg Aakre, Per Jørgensen, Vladimir Palicka, Marge Kutt, Mikko Anttonen, Mileva Georgieva Velizarova, Jania Marc |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 25% |
Finland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Librarian | 3 | 12% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 20% |
Computer Science | 3 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,132,318
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
#327
of 2,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,381
of 508,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,564 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.