The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
樹木モデルを組み込んだ対流・放射・湿気輸送連成解析による樹木の屋外温熱環境緩和効果の検討
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), January 2000
|
| DOI | 10.3130/aija.65.87_4 |
| Authors |
吉田 伸治, 大岡 龍三, 持田 灯, 富永 禎秀, 村上 周三 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,757,784
of 26,467,269 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#38
of 734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,316
of 112,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,467,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 734 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.