The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A better approach for dealing with reproducibility and replicability in science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2100769118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James D. Nichols, Madan K. Oli, William. L. Kendall, G. Scott Boomer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 45 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 58% |
| Scientists | 25 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2022.
All research outputs
#837,814
of 26,556,112 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#13,380
of 105,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,379
of 554,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#352
of 1,115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 554,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.