↓ Skip to main content

Myroides odoratimimus soft tissue infection in an immunocompetent child following a pig bite: case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Myroides odoratimimus soft tissue infection in an immunocompetent child following a pig bite: case report and literature review
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, July 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.bjid.2012.06.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sofia Maraki, Emmanouela Sarchianaki, Sophia Barbagadakis

Abstract

Members of the genus Myroides are aerobic Gram-negative bacteria that are common in environmental sources, but are not components of the normal human microflora. Myroides organisms behave as low-grade opportunistic pathogens, causing infections in severely immunocompromised patients and rarely, in immunocompetent hosts. A case of Myroides odoratimimus cellulitis following a pig bite in an immunocompetent child is presented, and the medical literature on Myroides spp. soft tissue infections is reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
India 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
Unknown 45 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,659,519
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#71
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,501
of 176,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.