↓ Skip to main content

Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage among outpatients attending primary health care centers: a comparative study of two cities in Saudi Arabia and Egypt

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage among outpatients attending primary health care centers: a comparative study of two cities in Saudi Arabia and Egypt
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.bjid.2014.09.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hala M. Abou Shady, Alaa Eldin A. Bakr, Mahmoud E. Hashad, Mohammad A. Alzohairy

Abstract

Epidemiological and molecular data on community acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is still scarce in both Egypt and Saudi Arabia. There is almost no data regarding MRSA prevalence in both countries. This study was conducted to investigate the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriage among outpatients attending primary health care centers in two big cities in both countries. A total of 206 nasal swabs were obtained, 103 swabs from each country. S. aureus isolates were characterized by antibiotic susceptibility, presence of mecA and PVL genes, SCCmec-typing and spa typing, the corresponding MLST CCs was assigned for each spa type based on the spa types in the Ridom StaphType database. MRSA was detected in 32% of the Egyptian outpatients (EGOs) while it was found in 25% of the Saudi Arabian outpatients (SAOs). All MRSA isolates belonged to SCCmec type V and IVa, where some isolates in Saudi Arabia remained nontypeable. Surprisingly PVL(+) isolates were low in frequency: 15% of MRSA Egyptian isolates and 12% of MRSA isolates in SAO. Two novel spa types were detected t11839 in Egypt, and t11841 in Saudi Arabia. We found 8 spa types among 20 isolates from Egypt, and 12 spa types out of 15 isolates from Saudi Arabia. Only two spa types t008 and t223 coexisted in both countries. Four clonal complexes (CC5, CC8, CC22, and CC80) were identified in both Egypt and Saudi Arabia. However, the data collected lacked a representation of isolates from different parts of each country as only one health center from each country was included, it still partially illustrates the CA-MRSA situation in both countries. In conclusion a set of control measures is required to prevent further increase in MRSA prevalence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,388,656
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#119
of 816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,866
of 363,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 816 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.