The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Foliar anatomy of Viola maculata growing in Parque Nacional Los Alerces, Chubut, Patagonia, Argentina
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.bjp.2016.03.008 |
Authors |
Chana Pilberg, Maria V. Ricco, Maria A. Alvarez |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 46% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
Professor | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 31% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
#800
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#323,534
of 367,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.