↓ Skip to main content

Identificar situaciones de riesgo para los pacientes en hemodiálisis mediante la adecuada valoración de su composición corporal

Overview of attention for article published in Nefrología (Madrid), May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identificar situaciones de riesgo para los pacientes en hemodiálisis mediante la adecuada valoración de su composición corporal
Published in
Nefrología (Madrid), May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.nefro.2016.01.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Castellano, Inés Palomares, Ulrich Moissl, Paul Chamney, Diana Carretero, Antonio Crespo, Camilo Morente, Laura Ribera, Peter Wabel, Rosa Ramos, José Ignacio Merello

Abstract

Circumstances such as gender, age, diabetes mellitus (DM) and renal failure impact on the body composition of patients. However, we use nutritional parameters such as lean and fat tissue with reference values from healthy subjects to assess the nutritional status of haemodialysis (HD) patients. To analyse body composition by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) of 6395 HD patients in order to obtain reference values of lean tissue index (LTI) and fat tissue index (FTI) from HD patients; and to confirm its validity by showing that those patients with LTI below the 10th percentile calculated for their group have greatest risk of death. We used the BIS to determine the LTI and FTI in our cohort of HD patients in Spain. We calculated the 10th percentile and 90th percentile of LTI and FTI in each age decile for patients grouped by gender and presence of DM. We collected clinical, laboratory and demographic parameters. The LTI/FTI 10 and 90 percentile values varied by group (age, gender and presence of DM) and, after adjusting for other risk factors such as fluid overload, those patients with LTI lower than percentile 10 had a higher relative risk of death (OR 1.57) than those patients with higher values. Monitoring the LTI and FTI of patients on HD using suitable reference values may help to identify risk in this patient population.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 26%
Other 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2016.
All research outputs
#21,157,205
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Nefrología (Madrid)
#12
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,981
of 313,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nefrología (Madrid)
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.6. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.