↓ Skip to main content

Estudio evolutivo de las glomerulonefritis en Castilla-La Mancha (GLOMANCHA) en el periodo 1994-2008

Overview of attention for article published in Nefrología (Madrid), May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estudio evolutivo de las glomerulonefritis en Castilla-La Mancha (GLOMANCHA) en el periodo 1994-2008
Published in
Nefrología (Madrid), May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.nefro.2016.01.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Luis Conde Olasagasti, Mercedes Acevedo Ribó, Ana Roca Muñoz, Carmen Vozmediano Poyatos, Francisco Rivera, María Luisa Illescas Fernández-Bermejo, Esperanza López Rubio, Javier Usón Carrasco, Serafín Tallón Lobo, Borja Quiroga, Gabriel de Arriba

Abstract

Renal biopsy registries allow histopathological data to be collected to improve knowledge of different pathologies and their natural history. To analyse the data of the Castilla La Mancha Glomerulonephritis Registry (GLOMANCHA) and the evolution of the different biopsy-proven pathologies between 1994 and 2008. The 6 most common biopsy-proven pathologies were collected during the 14 years of the study (941 biopsies) in the 5 participant centres of the autonomous community. In 2008, we assessed patient renal survival and mortality and we evaluated associated factors to each situation for each pathology. Of the 941 biopsies, 59% belonged to men, with a mean age of 48±18 years. At the time of the biopsy, the median glomerular filtration rate was 50.3 (25.5-76.3) ml/min/1,73 m(2) and median proteinuria was 3.4 (1.5-6.4) grams per day. The most common pathology were lupus nephropathy, followed by focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and membranous nephropathy. Lupus nephropathy and minimal change disease achieved the best renal prognosis during follow-up (mean 7.3±4.8 years). Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis type 3 and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis had the worst renal prognosis. In addition, rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis type 3 presented the worst vital prognosis. In GLOMANCHA, we demonstrate the poor prognosis of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis type 3, in contrast to minimal change disease or lupus nephropathy. Renal function is an independent predictor of renal survival and mortality in this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Mathematics 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#21,155,664
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Nefrología (Madrid)
#12
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,992
of 313,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nefrología (Madrid)
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.6. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.