↓ Skip to main content

To be or not to B27 positive: implications for the phenotypes of axial spondyloarthritis outcomes. Data from a large multiracial cohort from the Brazilian Registry of Spondyloarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Rheumatology, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To be or not to B27 positive: implications for the phenotypes of axial spondyloarthritis outcomes. Data from a large multiracial cohort from the Brazilian Registry of Spondyloarthritis
Published in
Advances in Rheumatology, April 2024
DOI 10.1186/s42358-024-00372-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Gomes Resende, Carla Goncalves Schahin Saad, Claudia Diniz Lopes Marques, Sandra Lúcia Euzébio Ribeiro, Maria Bernadete Renoldi de Oliveira Gavi, Michel Alexandre Yazbek, Adriana de Oliveira Marinho, Rita de Cássia Menin, Manuella Lima Gomes Ochtrop, Andressa Miozzo Soares, Nara Gualberto Cavalcanti, Jamille Nascimento Carneiro, Glaucio Ricardo Werner de Castro, José Mauro Carneiro Fernandes, Elziane da Cruz Ribeiro E Souza, Corina Quental de Menezes Alvarenga, Rejane Maria Rodrigues de Abreu Vieira, Natalia Pereira Machado, Antônio Carlos Ximenes, Morgana Ohira Gazzeta, Cleandro Pires de Albuquerque, Thelma Larocca Skare, Mauro Waldemar Keiserman, Charles Lubianca Kohem, Gabriel Sarkis Benacon, Vítor Florêncio Santos Rocha, Ricardo da Cruz Lage, Olivio Brito Malheiro, Rywka Tenenbaum Medeiros Golebiovski, Thauana Luiza Oliveira, Ruben Horst Duque, Ana Carolina Londe, Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro, Percival Degrava Sampaio-Barros

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Linguistics 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,560,169
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Rheumatology
#68
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,422
of 343,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Rheumatology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.