You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
A comparative study: use of a Brain-computer Interface (BCI) device by people with cerebral palsy in interaction with computers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0001-3765201520130413 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Regina O. Heidrich, Emely Jensen, Francisco Rebelo, Tiago Oliveira |
| Abstract |
This article presents a comparative study among people with cerebral palsy and healthy controls, of various ages, using a Brain-computer Interface (BCI) device. The research is qualitative in its approach. Researchers worked with Observational Case Studies. People with cerebral palsy and healthy controls were evaluated in Portugal and in Brazil. The study aimed to develop a study for product evaluation in order to perceive whether people with cerebral palsy could interact with the computer and compare whether their performance is similar to that of healthy controls when using the Brain-computer Interface. Ultimately, it was found that there are no significant differences between people with cerebral palsy in the two countries, as well as between populations without cerebral palsy (healthy controls). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
| Design | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 23% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |