The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Detection of musculoskeletal inflammatory lesions in patients with chronic chikungunya infection using 3T whole-body magnetic resonance imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0037-8682-0090-2024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aline Serfaty, Silvana Mendonça, Clarissa Canella, Edson Marchiori |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,745,659
of 26,012,510 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#551
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,632
of 366,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,012,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.