The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
MICHEL FOUCAULT: AS LUTAS EM TORNO DO PODER E A DINÁSTICA DO SABER
|
---|---|
Published in |
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1590/0100-512x2016n13504cc |
Authors |
Cesar Candiotto |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 33% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 17% |
Philosophy | 1 | 17% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 17% |
Linguistics | 1 | 17% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2017.
All research outputs
#23,434,496
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
#109
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,156
of 420,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.