The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relined fiberglass posts: influence of resin opacity on the bond strength to intraradicular dentin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Dental Journal, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-6440202405746 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Teresa Maluly-Proni, Mariana Elias Queiroz, Matheus Henrique Gomes, Thaís Yumi Umeda Suzuki, Bruna de Oliveira Reis, Paulo Henrique dos Santos |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,552,644
of 26,458,381 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Dental Journal
#176
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,781
of 384,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Dental Journal
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,458,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.