The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic characterization and predominance of the new CPV-2a variant in clinical cases of canine parvovirus in the western region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Rural, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20230386 |
| Authors |
Bianca de Castro Leal, José Conrado dos Santos Jardim, Maria Elisa Trost, Bruno Leite dos Anjos, Paula Fonseca Finger, Carolina Kist Traesel, Mário Celso Sperotto Brum |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#5,032,154
of 26,465,533 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#128
of 2,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,902
of 384,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#23
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,465,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,323 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.