The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Percepção da população brasileira sobre a assistência prestada pelo médico. Brasil, 2013
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1413-81232015212.19332015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Célia Landman Szwarcwald, Giseli Nogueira Damacena, Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza, Wanessa da Silva Almeida, Deborah Carvalho Malta |
| Abstract |
The objective was to analyze the perception of the Brazilian population on the medical health care, using data from the National Health Survey, 2013. Among those who have consulted with doctor in the 12 months prior to the survey, we analyzed 12 aspects related to health services and medical consultation, according to type of care (public/ private). By multivariate logistic regression, factors associated with dissatisfaction with the care received were investigated. For the dimensionality reduction of the assessed aspects, we used principal component analysis. The survey revealed that 74.2% of the adult Brazilian population consulted a doctor. Among the differences by type of care, stood out the way of getting an appointment, the type of doctor, the waiting time for service, and the reason for consultation. Median scores were concentrated in 80 (good), except for the waiting time between SUS users. Proportions of very good evaluation were, however, higher among users of the private sector. Despite the positive evaluation in both sectors, public and private, the configuration of the Federative Units in the plane formed by the two principal component axes followed a pattern of striking regional differences. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,775
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,814
of 406,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#30
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.