You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Borges against Borges: poor translations of “The Aleph”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Alea : Estudos Neolatinos, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1517-106x/2017193479493 |
| Authors |
Roberto González Echevarría |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 1 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2021.
All research outputs
#8,745,608
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Alea : Estudos Neolatinos
#13
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,243
of 424,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alea : Estudos Neolatinos
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.