The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impacts of the exposure of cactus species of the genus Tacinga to climate change in the Caatinga biome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Botanica Brasilica, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1677-941x-abb-2023-0177 |
| Authors |
Augusto César Praciano Sampaio, Arnóbio de Mendonça Barreto Cavalcante, Fábio Suzart de Albuquerque, Celso von Randow |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,228,610
of 26,393,142 outputs
Outputs from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#4
of 403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,979
of 381,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,393,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them