The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anthropology of madness: from the paradigms of exclusion and social inclusion to the neokraepelian rearmament
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mana: Studies in Social Anthropology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-49442020v26n2a206 |
| Authors |
José Manuel Hernández Garre, Baldomero de Maya Sánchez |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 40% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Mana: Studies in Social Anthropology
#60
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,899
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mana: Studies in Social Anthropology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.