The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The clinical challenge of achieving marginal adaptation in direct and indirect restorations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1590/1678-77572015ed005 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 21% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Librarian | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 63% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#304
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,628
of 359,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.