The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of sugarcane rind on the nutritional value of ruminant feeding
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientia Agricola, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1590/1678-992x-2022-0245 |
Authors |
Raiany Resende Moura, Michele Gabriel Camilo, Elizabeth Fônseca Processi, Alberto Magno Fernandes, Ismael Nacarati da Silva, Elon Souza Aniceto, Tadeu Silva de Oliveira |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,314,557
of 26,423,535 outputs
Outputs from Scientia Agricola
#13
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,572
of 382,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientia Agricola
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,423,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.