The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Organic residues and Parachlorella microalgae favor the growth and gas exchange of cedar
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientia Agricola, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-992x-2023-0077 |
| Authors |
Cleberton Correia Santos, Mauricio Lacerda de Oliveira, Dágon Manoel Ribeiro, Silvana de Paula Quintão Scalon, Jéssica Aline Linné, Juliana Milene Silverio, Vanda Maria de Aquino Figueiredo, Otávio Henrique Medina da Silva |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,332,138
of 26,529,613 outputs
Outputs from Scientia Agricola
#13
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,275
of 386,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientia Agricola
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,529,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.