The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validity of the Brazilian online version of the Sexual Desire Inventory 2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1806-9282.20240362 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Denisse Cartagena-Ramos, Miguel Fuentealba-Torres, Luiz Henrique Arroyo, Daniella Talita dos Santos, Flávio Rebustini, Lúcia Alves Silva Lara, Ricardo Alexandre Arcêncio, Lucila Castanheira Nascimento |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2024.
All research outputs
#18,094,769
of 26,476,278 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#416
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,761
of 384,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,476,278 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.