↓ Skip to main content

Nanocompostos utilizados no tratamento de lesões cutâneas: revisão de escopo

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanocompostos utilizados no tratamento de lesões cutâneas: revisão de escopo
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, January 2024
DOI 10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2023-0338pt
Authors

Wevernilson Francisco de Deus, Camylla Layanny Soares Lima, Ana Luiza Barbosa Negreiros, Phellype Kayyaã da Luz, Raylane da Silva Machado, Grazielle Roberta Freitas da Silva

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,881,753
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#177
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,303
of 362,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.