The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phenotypic and Positron Emission Tomography with [18F]fluordeoxyglucose (FDG PET) differences in corticobasal syndrome: comparison of two cases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dementia & Neuropsychologia, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2023-0085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thais Winkeler Beltrão, Eduardo Barbosa de Albuquerque Maranhão, Victor Adill Gomes Correia, Pedro Mota de Albuquerque, Mariana Gonçalves Maciel Pinheiro, Rayanne Acioli Lins Santos, Luiz Eduardo Duarte Borges Nunes, Simone Cristina Soares Brandão, Breno José Alencar Pires Barbosa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,897,855
of 26,206,339 outputs
Outputs from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#247
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,936
of 374,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dementia & Neuropsychologia
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,206,339 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.