↓ Skip to main content

Fish trophic network in karst streams from Brazilian Pantanal headwaters

Overview of attention for article published in Neotropical Ichthyology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fish trophic network in karst streams from Brazilian Pantanal headwaters
Published in
Neotropical Ichthyology, January 2024
DOI 10.1590/1982-0224-2024-0018
Authors

Francisco Severo-Neto, Karoline Ceron, Mônica Ceneviva-Bastos, Alan P. Covich, Lilian Casatti

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2024.
All research outputs
#17,574,986
of 26,556,112 outputs
Outputs from Neotropical Ichthyology
#584
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,435
of 387,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neotropical Ichthyology
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.