↓ Skip to main content

Communities of belonging, disinformation, and antagonism: interactional processes in anti-vaccine groups on Telegram in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Galáxia (São Paulo), January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Communities of belonging, disinformation, and antagonism: interactional processes in anti-vaccine groups on Telegram in Brazil
Published in
Galáxia (São Paulo), January 2024
DOI 10.1590/1982-2553202464635
Authors

Lídia Raquel Herculano Maia, Luisa Massarani, Marcelo Alves dos Santos, Thaiane Oliveira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#17,995,091
of 26,329,145 outputs
Outputs from Galáxia (São Paulo)
#30
of 57 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,222
of 378,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Galáxia (São Paulo)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,329,145 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them