↓ Skip to main content

O impacto da pandemia da COVID-19 para a divulgação científica

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
O impacto da pandemia da COVID-19 para a divulgação científica
Published in
CoDAS, January 2024
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20242024068pt
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Luiza Navas, Pamela Papile Lunardelo, Stela Maris Aguiar Lemos, Vanessa Veis Ribeiro, Leonardo Wanderley Lopes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,730,887
of 25,990,612 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#34
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,805
of 364,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.