↓ Skip to main content

Contribution to the knowledge of the Desmiphorini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) of the Neotropical Region

Overview of attention for article published in Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (São Paulo), January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribution to the knowledge of the Desmiphorini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) of the Neotropical Region
Published in
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (São Paulo), January 2005
DOI 10.1590/s0031-10492005001900001
Authors

Ubirajara R. Martins, Maria Helena M. Galileo

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (São Paulo)
#82
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,859
of 151,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (São Paulo)
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.