The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Supplementary feeding programs: a critical analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista de Saúde Pública, October 2004
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0034-89101990000500010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patricia Rondó Schilling |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 26% |
Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 16% |
Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 37% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 21% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#278
of 1,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,743
of 76,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.