You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Febre amarela. I - Aspectos cíclicos e epidemiológicos
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0037-86821976000100005 |
| Authors |
M. R. Q. de Kastner, Leon Cardeman, Mareia M. H. Gonçalves, M. C. K. Queralto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1983.
All research outputs
#8,821,477
of 26,071,599 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#212
of 1,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,919
of 211,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,071,599 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.