The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Aspectos radiológicos e epidemiológicos do granuloma central de células gigantes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Radiologia Brasileira, July 2007
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0100-39842007000300007 |
Authors |
José Wilson Noleto, Edson Marchiori, Renato Kobler Sampaio, Klaus L. Irion, Felipe Birchal Collares |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 20% |
Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
Professor | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 60% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2018.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Radiologia Brasileira
#303
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,626
of 76,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiologia Brasileira
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.