↓ Skip to main content

Teaching chemistry at the Higher School of Agriculture "São Bento", Olinda - São Lourenço da Mata - Pernambuco (1912-1936)

Overview of attention for article published in Química Nova, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Teaching chemistry at the Higher School of Agriculture "São Bento", Olinda - São Lourenço da Mata - Pernambuco (1912-1936)
Published in
Química Nova, January 2008
DOI 10.1590/s0100-40422008000300041
Authors

Francisco de Oliveira Magalhães, Cláudio Augusto Gomes da Câmara, Argus Vasconcelos de Almeida

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Química Nova
#88
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,440
of 168,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Química Nova
#6
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.