↓ Skip to main content

Newborn screening for biotinidase deficiency in Brazil: biochemical and molecular characterizations

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Newborn screening for biotinidase deficiency in Brazil: biochemical and molecular characterizations
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, March 2004
DOI 10.1590/s0100-879x2004000300001
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. C. Neto, J. Schulte, R. Rubim, E. Lewis, J. DeMari, C. Castilhos, A. Brites, R. Giugliani, K.P. Jensen, B. Wolf

Abstract

Biotinidase deficiency is an inherited metabolic disorder characterized by neurological and cutaneous symptoms. Fortunately, it can be treated and the symptoms prevented by oral administration of the vitamin biotin. Using dried blood-soaked filter paper cards, biotinidase activity was determined in the sera of 225,136 newborns in Brazil. Mutation analysis performed on DNA from 21 babies with low serum biotinidase activity confirmed that 3 had profound biotinidase deficiency (less than 10% of mean normal sera biotinidase activity), 10 had partial biotinidase deficiency (10 to 30% of mean normal serum activity), 1 was homozygous for partial biotinidase deficiency, 4 were heterozygous for either profound or partial deficiency, and 3 were normal. Variability in serum enzyme activities and discrepancies with mutation analyses were probably due to inappropriate handling and storage of samples sent to the laboratory. Obtaining an appropriate control serum at the same time as that of the suspected child will undoubtedly decrease the false-positive rate (0.09%). Mutation analysis can be used to confirm the genotype of these children. The estimated incidence of biotinidase deficiency in Brazil is about 1 in 9,000, higher than in most other countries. Screening and treatment of biotinidase deficiency are effective and warranted. These results strongly suggest that biotinidase deficiency should be included in the newborn mass screening program of Brazil.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Other 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#294
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,456
of 63,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.