The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Compulsive buying: systematic review of the therapeutic options
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, December 2008
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0101-81082008000200009 |
Authors |
Helio Tonelli, Cristiano Estevez Alvarez, Cristina Bertolucci, Dayane Diomario Rosa |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 4 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,240,906
of 25,381,384 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
#51
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,353
of 182,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,384 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.