The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Competição de cultivares de alface sob cultivo hidropônico 'NFT' em três diferentes espaçamentos
|
---|---|
Published in |
Horticultura Brasileira, July 1999
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0102-05361999000200016 |
Authors |
Ronan Gualberto, Francisco Vilela Resende, Leila Trevizan Braz |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 50% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 3 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 25% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,992,163
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Horticultura Brasileira
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,899
of 35,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Horticultura Brasileira
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them