You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Medical expressions: shortcomings and suitability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, September 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0102-76382003000300002 |
| Authors |
Simônides Bacelar, Carmem Cecília Galvão, Elaine Alves, Paulo Tubino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#16,623,012
of 26,205,030 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#122
of 370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,832
of 54,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,205,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.