↓ Skip to main content

Nísia Floresta e mulheres de letras no Rio Grande do Norte: pioneiras na luta pela cidadania

Overview of attention for article published in Estudos Feministas, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nísia Floresta e mulheres de letras no Rio Grande do Norte: pioneiras na luta pela cidadania
Published in
Estudos Feministas, August 2005
DOI 10.1590/s0104-026x2005000100016
Authors

Rachel Soihet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%
Design 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,875,607
of 26,205,030 outputs
Outputs from Estudos Feministas
#152
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,402
of 69,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estudos Feministas
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,205,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.