The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
¿Colonialismo biomédico o autonomía de lo local? Sanadores tradicionales contra la tuberculosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0104-59702010000400004 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Antonio Miguel Ortega Martos |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Brazil | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 4 | 20% |
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 12 | 60% |
Arts and Humanities | 5 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,073,001
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#659
of 1,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,926
of 197,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.