The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
HIV/Aids,1 os estigmas e a história
|
---|---|
Published in |
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0104-59702018000200001 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
André Felipe Cândido da Silva, Marcos Cueto |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 31% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 77% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,073,145
of 26,312,176 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#659
of 1,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,939
of 346,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,312,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.