↓ Skip to main content

Redesenhando o Mapa Eleitoral do Brasil: uma proposta de reforma política incremental

Overview of attention for article published in Opinião Pública, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Redesenhando o Mapa Eleitoral do Brasil: uma proposta de reforma política incremental
Published in
Opinião Pública, July 2011
DOI 10.1590/s0104-62762011000100002
Authors

Octavio Amorim Neto, Bruno Freitas Cortez, Samuel de Abreu Pessoa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 16%
Unknown 26 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 61%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Opinião Pública
#125
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,154
of 127,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Opinião Pública
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.