The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Investigation of coalescence kinetics of microcristalline cellulose in fluidised bed spray agglomeration: experimental studies and modelling approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, April 2006
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0104-66322005000200002 |
Authors |
M. Peglow, J. Kumar, L. Mörl |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
Professor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 3 | 50% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Chemistry | 1 | 17% |
Materials Science | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
#55
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,032
of 84,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them