The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The drying of sewage sludge by immersion frying
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, April 2006
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0104-66322005000200015 |
Authors |
D. P. Silva, V. Rudolph, O. P. Taranto |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 33% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 4 | 27% |
Chemical Engineering | 3 | 20% |
Chemistry | 2 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,650,860
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
#55
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,234
of 85,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them