↓ Skip to main content

Lumping procedure for a kinetic model of catalytic naphtha reforming

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lumping procedure for a kinetic model of catalytic naphtha reforming
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, January 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0104-66322009000400011
Authors

H. M. Arani, M. Shirvani, K. Safdarian, E. Dorostkar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 3%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 26%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Professor 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 21 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 15 26%
Engineering 10 17%
Chemistry 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 25 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
#55
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,377
of 173,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.