The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Como podemos pensar
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1415-47142011000100002 |
Authors |
Vannevar Bush |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 24% |
Student > Master | 5 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Librarian | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 7 | 28% |
Computer Science | 5 | 20% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 8% |
Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2011.
All research outputs
#6,560,525
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental
#10
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,130
of 119,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latinoamericana de Psicopatologia Fundamental
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.